What the cinnamon toast fuck did we just see in Afghanistan?

There is a saying I learned in the military, it’s called the 6 Ps, “Prior planning prevents piss poor performance.” And what we witnessed over the past few days in Afghanistan is as piss poor a performance as you could imagine. This administration should have seen the warning signs; a rapidly advancing Taliban, a rapidly dissolving Afghan Army, willing to drop weapons and run when offered. I think the Afghan Army just gave the French a relief from all the jokes about being “surrender monkeys”.


This was a complete failure of leadership and intelligence, both military and civilian. There were no apparent plans to gracefully exit the country. One airbase should have been a defensive nightmare to try to penetrate. Foxholes, overlapping field of fire, indirect fire kill zones, etc… Then once it was apparent there was an imminent collapse of internal security in the country, as was apparent about 2 to 3 weeks ago, ALL AMERIFCAN citizens and Afghan nationals we were going to evac from the country should have been rallied to that secure airbase and the evacuations begun. Any attempt to attack the airfield, aircraft or the evacuees should have been met with instant and overwhelming lethal force.


You will see lots of blame being tossed around and there is plenty to go around; Bush for starting the war in the first place with no apparent exit strategy. Obama for not developing an exit strategy over his EIGHT years in office. Trump, same blame as Obama, though he only had one term worth of planning he could have done. Now Trump is catching it for even trying to negotiate peace with the Taliban, but at some point, if you want to leave a country you invaded, you must negotiate a peace. As Tyrion said in Game of Thrones “We make peace with our enemies, not our friends.” A good peace deal might have worked, even if it meant a Taliban presence in the Afghan government. Then there is the current president, Biden, well it happened under his watch so naturally he should bear a good measure as well. Not to mention he was VP for Obama for those EIGHT years. Sat in on all the same meetings. Had the same access to intel. He promised us he had plans upon plans for dealing with everything Trump had messed up. What happened here Mr. President? Where are your plans? Those contingencies for contingencies that you should have had waiting? The Pentagon planners are supposed to prepare for every possible contingency. The fact none could see this complete collapse of internal security shows it may be time to clean house in the intel and planning departments of the US Government, military and civilian. And I say this, because many talking heads on TV and radio were warning of this possibility even as Trump was negotiating a deal with the Taliban remnants to withdraw our forces in late 2019 and early 2020. They warned that if the deal was not solid and workable, a Saigon moment was in the making.

Congress needs to come together and call for an investigation into what happened. With a special focus on why so much military gear was left behind. The fact Blackhawk helicopters were left on the ground with high end drones still in carrying containers and an arsenal of firearms, among other things, shows a failure of military leadership. A complete serial number inventory needs to be conducted to determine exactly what was left behind. I’ve seen people loose rank over misplacing a gas mask. But I guess dropping a few functional Blackhawk helicopters to enemy hands or multimillion dollar drones or enough weapons to arm a small army is no big deal, right? Every field or flag grade officer that signed off on leaving all that gear behind without scuttling or rending it inoperable should be booted from the military regardless of how many bars, oak leaf clusters, eagles and stars are tossed out. Even if that includes people on the Joint Chiefs or some of the Service Secretaries. There is no excuse for leaving all that gear behind, gear that could eventually be used against America or its allies in some future attack. How many times did we see officials from the military and current administration clearly say we would not see another Saigon, or that the Taliban taking over the country was not foreseeable? All these people need to be held accountable for their lack of imagination. But Congress will circle the wagons, as they usually do, when the president is of the same party as the Speaker of the House.

I suspect, had this collapse happened under Trump, the House Managers for a new impeachment would have already been chosen and the clown walk to the Senate with the Articles in the cedar box would have already been done. More souvenir pens from Pelosi commemorating the “very serious affair” third impeachment would have been passed out after the obligatory photo op.

How Speaker Pelosi Is Force Feeding Senator Schumer A Schiff Sandwich

Let us take a moment and look back on the events surrounding the third official impeachment of a President of the United States. The quest for impeachment started as early as April 17th 2016 based on this Politico Europe article I was able to find. President Trump wasn’t even the nominee and the word impeachment was at least in the hearts and minds of the Democrats and their sycophantic media, if not on their actual lips. In Congress the first actual attempt at an impeachment resolution was done by Representatives Al Green (D-TX) and Brad Sherman (D-NY) on December 6th 2017.

Following that failed attempt, the I-word was tossed around several times a week by pundits, talking heads and the subjective “news” media throughout 2018 and 2019. I defy anyone to find me a single prime time Monday through Friday broadcast week on MSNBC, CNN, ABC News or CBS News that lacked at least one person talking not just about the possibility of impeachment but rooting for it, I’ll wait…

In 2019, when the House gavel was unwisely passed back to Nancy Pelosi, there was little doubt in anyone’s mind that she was salivating to impeach Donald Trump. That little scheming gleam in beady, dead eyes, that sly side clap she rendered at the 2019 State of the Union Address and her constant denial about impeachment not being a priority, when anyone with higher brain functions knew better. She was of course biding her time, waiting for the Mueller Report to drop to give her all the starting power she needed to launch a full-throated impeachment inquiry. When that report landed with a thud and shoulder shrug by most people, it was time for Plan B, PLAN BULLSHIT.

Plan Bullshit was to find anything they could hang on Trump. This included but was not limited to: violations of the Domestic Emoluments Clause, violations of the Foreign Emoluments Clause, obstruction of justice, inappropriately disclosing classified information, destruction of public records, payment of ransom with federal funds in violation of international law, authorizing security clearances for people who are known security risks, failure to protect U.S. elections from foreign interference, campaign finance law violations, condoning white nationalism, using law enforcement to punish political enemies, attacking the press as “enemies of the people”, mismanagement by failing to fill vacancies, separation of immigrant children from their families and on and on. Then what should pop up for Adam Schiff, a notice from a “whistleblower” about a phone call, one the “whistleblower” did not have direct knowledge of as he or she, oh we all know it was a he, was not a participant on the call.

Supposition begins. Here is where the scheme fell apart. Schiff goes to Pelosi and tells her he has Trump dead to rights. That he has a “whistleblower” that can prove Trump tried to either bribe or extort the country of Ukraine for his own political gains by using money Congress had lawfully appropriated for Ukraine. It was at that moment Pelosi pounced and started the gears of impeachment turning. Then, in what is probably the most masterful stroke of monkeywrenching, Trump releases the call notes, stop calling it a transcript people, from the call. This totally threw the narrative by the Democrats into disarray. They were expecting to be able to frame the call in anyway they saw fit. Schiff’s opening statement of lies, or “parodies” as he calls them, about the contents of the call prove this. But Pelosi had already rung the impeachment bell, something impossible to unring. They proceeded with the investigations anyway to get Trump to just quit, to walk away, in the same way Nixon walked away. But Trump endured. And what did the House conjure up, two whole Articles of Impeachment, one for Abuse of Power and the other for Obstruction of Congress. Two of the weakest impeachment articles to ever hit the Senate since its founding. Then, inexplicably, Pelosi does not immediately transmit the Articles to the Senate. She sits on them, for reasons only known to her, but she was really trying to goad Trump into resigning. She was hoping he would step down instead of going through a full Senate trial. But again, Trump endured. Supposition ends.

Now that we are on day 9 or 10 or 200 of the impeachment trial in the Senate, a new debate has come forth about allowing John Bolton and other witnesses to testify in the Senate. This is nonsensical from every perspective. Bolton has never given any sworn testimony about Trump and his dealings with the Ukraine. Any testimony he provides would be entirely new to the impeachment investigation. This would never be allowed in a court of law at any level. If the Democrats are going to continue this charade of wanting a fair trial, then a fair trial must honor the rules of discovery or face Brady violations. Also, a fair trial would not allow the entry of propensity evidence, AKA uncharged misconduct, AKA violations of Federal Rules of Evidence 404(b) to take place, which they have done on numerous occasions. The only witnesses that should be allowed are those that have already provided sworn testimony about the matters on trial, whether the original testimony was acquired during the formal House impeachment investigations, the Mueller investigations or any other previous, relevant investigations. This honors the historical precedent of witnesses that have appeared in all the previous, modern Senate impeachment trials.

In closing I offer a bit of advice, an escape hatch, to Senator Schumer and his Democrat colleagues in the Senate. Put forth a resolution for a Senate vote to terminate, without ruling, the current trial and allow the House Managers to withdraw the current Articles so they may prepare a more thorough and complete record of the investigation. Inform your House colleagues it is not the job of the Senate to conduct the investigation, it is the job of the Senate to rule on what has previously been investigated by the House as required by the Constitution. This would basically force the Schiff sandwich back to Pelosi, where it rightly belongs. Let her decide the next step. Everyone knows this is going down in flames. It is unlikely the Republicans are going to allow for unvetted witnesses to testify. Be smart Senator Schumer, you have gotten a good whiff of this Schiff sandwich, you know what taking the bite of it is going to taste like.